Home
              "A CENTURY OF FAMILY AUTOCRACY IN NEPAL"

         D. R. Regmi

KATHMANDU, NEPAL 1949

......

                   

 

                                                             FOREWARD  

 

             BY DR. B. PATTABHI SITARAMAYYA, PRESIDENT, INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS  

              In the midst of a flowing river in its freshes with its undulatory waves and their ripples, with its whirling eddies and treacherous shoals, you find here and there a few islets and islands, which, in every way, present a glaring contrast to the rushing torrents of turbid waters charged with alluvium from the mountains and forests traversed by the full flooded streams. Even such was the contrast between Bharat and the sovereign States carved out by the British. These 562 States have now been effaced from the map of India and are no longer the citadels of autocracy that they had been for a century and a quarter. Not far removed from this category of islets in the vast ocean flood of Bharat lies to the North a tiny little island nestled on mountain heights 55,000 sq. miles in extent, with a population of eight millions and a revenue of four crore rupees, largely derived from agricultural land. Except that the King of Nepal is considered His Majesty and that Ambassadors were accredited to the State, this tiny island had presented for long and presents today the same autocracy, the same limited number of Ranas who are of the favored class and whose families not more than forty in number, are heaven born dubbing every member a Colonel or General or Lt.General. These are the members of the ruling class, judges without legal knowledge, generals without military training and administrators without past experience. The Prime Ministers place is as much a hereditary fixture as that of the real king who is a figure-head like the Mul Virat of the Hindu temples while the priests enjoying hereditary rights are the heirs of all the privileges and rulership.   

            Nepal is a police State where law and order are maintained by arbitrary rule and barbarous physical torture is extent as a form of punishment, where civil liberties are unknown, popular and public life is anathema, education is at a low ebb and pinhead organization functions under sufferance. Nay, human intercourse between Nepal and the outside world is virtually cut off so far as ingress is concerned, and young men outside the pale royal patronage and family oligarchy can look forward to no careers worth mentioning. There is no ideology of freedom permitted to be propagated, and men and women grow virtually as a sub-human race. Nepal is really an incongruity and anachronism in the modern age. The wealth of the country-mineral and the forest alike-is left unexplored. Outside Katmandu the law prohibits even the building of pucca house with tiled roofing by a non-rana without the permission of the authorities. Life and property are unsafe. The bulk of the revenues go to the coffers of the Prime Minister and his relations. Slavery was only abolished in 1923, but it really transformed and takes on the garb of a voluntary agreement to the loss of one’s freedom by mortgaging oneself.   

           British diplomacy which had planted the Sultans of Malaya, the Shan states of Burma and the Indian Princes-the same diplomacy succeeded in reducing the king of Nepal to that of  a nominal head (for he had signed away his powers to the Rana family) and converting himself into a prisoner in the palace, who is kept under the strictest surveillance and not allowed  to exercise any power whatever. The heir-apparent’s position is no better and one may live in Nepal for many years without seeing or hearing of the king. Even into such a n isolated and antediluvian land the call of freedom penetrated and had its echoes and re-echoes in remote corners, its percussions and re-percussions on the people all over. It was the outbreak of the Second World War really that brought into being a Praja Parishad (composed of some Nepalese youth) which had started operations at Patna and later transferred them to Kathmandu. It was no small achievement for the Parishad to be able to bring the young king of the day to organization and secure his patronage for itself.  Nevertheless its members later faced the usual music of life or long term imprisonments, while shooting and underground activities later came into being. The shooting of two of the hanging of two others in the blood of the martyrs which has since become the seed of the Church of Freedom. Although the Praja Parishad met with an untimely end it had achieved unique success in awakening the masses to had achieved unique success in awakening the masses and creating them a spirit of revolt against tyranny. Nepal has since taken to the pursuit of her task of self-emancipation both from within and without. Nepal too has had her reforms, but they perpetuate the absolute and personal rule in the state. Economic reforms, university education and agricultural improvement are still in the dreamland. As usual the popular organization suffered internal division, but the task of Nepal National Congress continued with the Praja Panchayat as a sister body raising the banner of revolt inside Nepal.  

             Political speeches and police notifications went apace. Satyagraha and councils of action presently came into being. But divided councils of action presently came into being. But divided counsels and internecine differences here as elsewhere spoiled the prospect. Although all was quiet that supervened on a period of stress and strain, widespread awakening and deep-rooted self-consciousness. The seeming silence of the people marks their sullenness, not their satisfaction. Nepal cannot remain an autocracy while Bharat enjoys the honor of a sovereign republic. Bharat has no designs upon Nepal and casts no evil eye upon its navigable rivers, its abundant forest wealth or its rich mineral resources, its oranges or sugar cane, its jute and hessian, its rice and millet, its rye and maize or its barley and potato. Nepal’s pure Aryan race and glorious and culture constitute an inseparable link between Nepal and Bharat. Bharat's interest in Nepal is no less and no more than her interest in Nepal is no less and no more than her interest in other Asiatic countries. But Nepal’s present state will not be allowed to continue without disturbing Bharat’s feeling and mind.  

           The thanks of public in general and of Nepal in particular and due to the author Shree D. R. Regmi, for this account in lucid and fascinating style, of the history and present position of Nepal. Where there is real awakening   of the people, no one can resist their right to inherit what is theirs by right and efforts

New Delhi:

19-10-1949  (Sd) B. Pattabhi Sitaramayyya    

 

                                        

....



1